Amicable settlement: the very objective of the pre-litigation procedure
/in news /by epsu-cj
EPSU CJ addressed to the Registrar of the Court an open letter, in which it refers to the consistent case-law of the Court of Justice and the General Court.
Resolution: Sharing Experience, Building Solidarity!
/in news /by epsu-cj
The General Meeting of EPSU CJ has defined the orientations of the union for the next period (read its Resolution). It further approved its accounts. Members’ subscriptions – which guarantee independence – amounted to € 23 675,98. Click on the picture to see how expenses are broken down.
European elections
/in news /by epsu-cjAnnual update of salaries: +1.7%
/in news /by epsu-cj
The update taking effect on 1 July 2018 is +1.7%. You may find here some explanations on how this figure was calculated. You can also find the updated salary grids for officials and temporary staff and for contract staff (see comparison with Luxembourg minimum social wage as from 1-1-2019 and pay supplement (in FR)).
Social Minimum Wage increased – Supplement adjustment
/in news /by epsu-cjOn the basis of an agreement concluded with EPSU CJ, the Court pays, since the beginning of year 2018, to contract staff with a gross salary lower than the Luxembourg social minimum wage a Pay supplement. The social minimum wage was increased (+2.5%) as from 1 August 2018; see Social minimum wage and indexation of salaries; Sozialer Mindestlohn und Lohnindexierung. Therefore, the Court Administration will have to recalculate its pay supplement in function of the new Luxembourg amounts. The increasing gap between the EU gross salary and the Luxembourg social minimum wage will also result in an increasing number of recipients of this amount. Check the (unchanged) pay grid for contract staff, in relation to the (increased) Luxembourg Social Minimum Wage.
JSIS : What remedies for a sick scheme ?
/in news /by epsu-cj
By a “Note setting a Legal Framework “, the Sickness Insurance Management Committee has identified three problems affecting this scheme: 1. Problems of access to health care; 2. Overpricing in relation to the rates applicable to national insured persons; 3. The obligation to contribute to a national health insurance scheme. EPSU CJ comments on each of the three (in FR).









